LOL, so have I - it has been sitting in a drawer for two years and has 3 games for it that I paid like $60 each for when it came out. Man oh man, what a waste of money that thing turned out to be. Now I can't even sell it because noone wants it.

That, and the chipsets with the features they needed were still on the drawing board/prototype stage. They could have waited another year for the chips to mature but they decided to go with what was best at the time.

Like you said, live with it.

Not true - most people DO NOT have GPS but wouldn't mind having it - friends who have started using GPS are those who have smartphones like the N95 - sure, iPhone doesn't have turn-by-turn GPS, but hopefully that can be added.

Wifi is not available everywhere - and 3G is faster than GPRS, so having that as a backup option is a GOOD thing - it may not help you, but it sure helps a lot of other people.

Completely wrong analogy. You are talking difference in resolutions - the right analogy would be if the new iPhone has a new resolution - the iPhone now has newer features like 3G and GPS - so the correct analogy is if you are buying a TV that has a new feature built-in, like a HD Bluray player, or Teletext, or ability to connect wirelessly etc.


Mmm...

+ 1 too

Nope, sorry. Try

I like 3G. If everyone stopped buying iPhones i would be certain that Apple would stop producing such product as there would obviously be no demand. If you want Apple to care give them a reason to care. If you would like a product to be developed a certain way you should create a competing product yourself in a hope that many others share your needs, maybe then when you have gain a bit of the market share Apple will pay attention to you.

It's very simple, if the good is not demanded by you then intrinsically you will not buy it, there is no you telling people not to purchase a product purely as a basis of trying to further product development. Technology and products cannot be furthered without capital, no sales = no advancement.